Accelerated aging of the body's organ systems is associated with an increased risk of disease. Although deep learning models using healthy population training and diseased population testing are currently proposed, the potential of mixed-population based biological age prediction for multi-organ systems remains unexplored.
This study proposes a new paradigm for systematically quantifying multi-organ aging trajectories to address key limitations in current biological age studies: (a) Existing models generally ignore the dynamic effects of disease status on organ-specific aging rates; (b) Relying primarily on imaging models ignores the potential utility of electronic health record (EHR) data. The model was developed based on multidimensional phenotypic data (including anthropometric indicators, physiological function parameters), structured clinical records (International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition [ICD-10] code and clinical diagnostic text) and prescription medication records of 457,044 participants aged 40-85 years in the UK Biobank.
Our model shows accurate multi-organ system age estimates with a mean absolute error of 3.59 to 3.65 years, and a strong correlation (0.80-0.81) between the predicted ages of each organ and the actual ages. The predicted organ ages also showed a risk stratification ability comparable to actual age. The model was explained by the conclusion analysis, and the age-specific patterns of different organ systems were revealed.
After system bias, the organ system age gap (the difference between the predicted age of the organ system and the actual age) can reflect the health of the organ. In order to better analyze the relationship between different organ systems, we classify the groups with different organ systems. The average Age Gap of each organ system is 0.92±4.07 years, the average Age Gap of hepatic Group is 0.92±4.07 years: 0.08±3.92 years old, immune Group mean Age Gap: 0.12±3.89 years old, metabolic Group mean Age Gap: 0.59±3.92 years old, musculoskeletal Group mean Age Gap: 0.69±4.07 years, the mean Age Gap of the pulmonary Group: 0.48±4.38 years, and the mean Age Gaps of the renal Group: -0.001±4.10 years) and the healthy group (mean Age Gaps: Compared to 0.004±3.58 years), the organ age difference was higher, averaging -0.005±0.88 years.
Using Cox proportional hazard regression models, we assessed the potential effect of different organ age gaps on the risk of developing disease over a 5-year period in the participants used. Our research suggests that organ aging can serve as a valuable biomarker of organ disease risk (cardiovascular Group HR=1.17, 95%CI:1.15-1.18, p<0.001; hepatic Group HR=1.03, 95%CI:1.02-1.04, p<0.001; immune Group HR=1.06,95%CI:1.04-1.08, p<0.001; metabolic Group HR=1.17,95%CI:1.15-1.19, p<0.001; musculoskeletal Group HR=1.15,95%CI:1.13-1.16, p<0.001; pulmonary Group HR=1.11,95%CI:1.09-1.05, p<0.001; renal Group HR=1.15,95%CI:1.13-1.17, p<0.001), which means that it is not likely to play a role in future disease risk screening for those who already have the disease, not only for early detection online, but also for risk stratification and personalized disease screening.